I practice some magical passes from time to time, not as often as I like, but some of them are very hard to memorize.
Is it important to memorize them, or performing watching the videos is ok also?
What is the password for these links? do they work?
Archived from Reddit · score: 10 · upvote ratio: 92% · flair: Tensegrity
No one knows the answer to that. It is in fact an interesting question, which only arises due to technology.
Of course, the main thing is to KEEP practicing, which would tend to eliminate your problem over time.
And don’t forget, Tensegrity can’t work unless your assemblage point moves, and your assemblage point won’t move, as long as you keep talking to yourself about this single position humanity has fallen into.
Don’t satisfy yourself with “Chi Gungy Goodness” the way old retired schinese people do, while hitting on each other in parks in Beijing.
Tensegrity does SPECTACULAR
Here’s that possible connection to technology. I hope to live long enough to do it. I animated all tensegrity moves for which there’s a good video, which is only around half. Paid a team in Pakistan.
The other half is temporarily “lost”.
But it’s still so much available tensegrity a person could learn, that in fact they’d NEVER be able to memorize it all.
I know that for a fact from studying martial arts at many places, noticing not a single person in any of them knew all of their “katas” (forms). And that the leaders of those groups knew even fewer than anyone else. Over time, they literally stopped practicing.
But it’s trivial to make a virtual teacher these days, and have her show up when you have virtual reality goggles on, which also block all light in the room.
So that we have a chance to practice ALL tensegrity, daily over weeks of time, using an AI teacher which keeps track of which forms you need to be doing next, so as to go through all of them.
Virtual Kylie!
Don’t blame me for the sexiness, that was Dall-E. You should have seen how excited Grok got. It’s versions were naked.
And I’m pretty sure Kylie was gay anyway…
I should add, that although we’ve lost half the forms Carlos gave us, I have a secondary project to make a virtual portal back to Dance Home in the 1990s, so that people can go learn the missing forms directly from Carlos.
Time travel is pretty much behind a lot of what our sorcery became over time.
It’s also potentially a reason that if we ever find another real magical system out there, one which works instead of being pretend, it’s not likely to be as “rich” as ours.
For example, the Austronesian witches on the mountains of Taiwan.
I’m pretty sure, from my limited contact with them and from what AIs say, that their witchcraft is real.
But it didn’t evolve in a valley filled with tens of thousands of old seer sorcerers.
It was always just a very few witches per Austronesian tribe, of which there were only dozens, and they tended to fight with the other tribes. Removing heads of some of their enemies, to display them as trophies.
So their ability to move their assemblage points wasn’t as well developed as ours, relying on starvation and stress rather than thousands of years of techniques developed through competition with other sorcerers. As the Olmecs did.
Taiwan didn’t have any viable power plants, which is one reason I believe their magic is real. They aren’t shaman druggies holding their hand out for money.
Never were.
Here’s the virtual dance home on the outside.
Eventually I hope to make cartoons simulating private classes well enough to be used in SK to go back and watch individual classes.
It was always emphasized in the Tensegrity workshops that I went to in the 1990’s that it important to overload your mind with too much information, too many instructions, too many tensegrity moves. Because, at some point, your mind will just give up trying to hold on to all that data, and you’ll start moving without thinking, without translating everything through your normal filters. Your normal way of thinking is what is keeping you rooted in your normal reality.
So, do the opposite of your inclination to “master” tensegrity. Watch a long series on youtube, and then try to recreate it without the video. It’s almost like you’re trying to recapitulate the series.
Maybe try to see the puffs and allies first through gazing at something without blinking, and then practice a simple pass like Zuleica’s pass to swing them around. Then once you get an understanding of what that does you can try something more complex like stellar hatch to have more complex effects.
Can we access the animations you made of all the tensegrity moves for which good video exists?
I had the same thing… until Jadeys’ Saturday classes, you can find on youtube on the Sorcery Passes channel.
Sure. Which one do you want? They’re “raw”. FBX format.
I could send you DVD1 to see if you can load it into anything.
I’ve been thinking about putting it all up on archive dot org, but it’s still not all that good.
I’d figured I’d tweak them when I deploy them in a cartoon, to show what Tensegrity looks like in the red zone, and in Silent Knowledge.
It’s pretty darned impressive!!!
Check out the post I might finish today or tomorrow.
How to form a “ring of fire” magical object using Tensegrity movements.
Those stick around a good 20 minutes solid, letting you play with them.
I suppose they’re capable of producing “practical magic” if someone felt like putting in the effort.
But that would be like becoming a “taffy expert” when you live next to that famous candy store in Laguna.
Why on earth would you limit yourself to taffy? Just to impress your friends?
Who won’t believe you anyway.
It looks like Daniel Ingram’s latest Buddhist scheme is to become a taffy expert.
Witchy found some announcement he made, looking for “magic men” to join his new group dedicated to helping mankind.
With Buddhism…
What’s that github.io link???
„Link Lock is a tool for adding a password to a link; in other words, for encrypting and decrypting URLs. When a user visits an encrypted URL, they will be prompted for a password. If the password is correct, Link Lock sends them to the hidden website. Otherwise, an error is displayed. Users can also add hints to remind them of the password.“
from https://jstrieb.github.io/link-lock/create/
the basic idea is that it might help to ensure the videos aren’t taken down straight away.
So the link OP posted has secret tensegrity videos? :o
No secrets.
yes, but not really secret - the links are in the wiki (video section):
/t/booklist/5256
I think the pink puffs are just normal physiology, it’s just how our eyes work in the dark with the rods and cones adapting, there is no magic in it. I don’t recall darkroom gazing mentioned in Castaneda books.
The only thing I found true so far, was looking at my hands in the dream, and that triggered a lucid dream, but I don’t know if this is an original idea or maybe it’s written somewhere else before.. Also if that works doesn’t mean that everything else works.
But still there are some beautiful ideas in his books, like Recapitulation, stopping the world, and the flyers, and it’s strange how the critics just care if Don Juan Matus existed or not.
I don’t want to sound materialistic, but does this stopping the internal dialogue makes us feel better? Does looking at the energy as it flows in the universe, helps in anything?
It worked
Thank you
The pink puffs, or puffs of any color, can be seen in daylight too, with entities and waking dreams coming out of them to greet you.
I don’t think the physical eyes and the physical brain are actually that important and it’s mostly just a cultural construction. As wild as it might sound, if you taught children to see using their elbows rather than their eyes, that may be the way it works, biology being a constructed illusion when all we have is an inscrutable ocean of consciousness. If a materialist thinks the visual phenomena here are just the eyes or brain it’s probably just because it’s not bright or complex enough for them yet.
Dan HATES this Eastern mystic guy, but he is a good writer and gives a very well written summary of why the pink puffs are not just physiology:
No, it was neither optical illusion nor hallucination nor coincidence (chromatic) nor auto-suggestion nor any of the other ponderous and vacant polysyllables by which physical science tries to explain away or rather avoid explaining the (scientifically) inexplicable. In these matters the scientist is always doing what he is always blaming the layman for doing when the latter lays down the law on things about which he is profoundly ignorant, without investigation or experiment, without ascertained knowledge – simply by evolving a theory or a priori idea out of his own mind and plastering it as a label on the unexplained phenomena.
There is, as I have told you, a whole range or many inexhaustible ranges of sensory phenomena other than the outward physical which one can become conscious of, see, hear, feel, smell, touch, mentally contact – to use the new established Americanism … The first sign of its opening in the externalised way is very often that seeing of “sparkles” or small luminous dots, shapes, etc., which was your first introduction to the matter; a second is, often enough, the seeing of circles of light or colour around objects, most easily round luminous objects like a star; seeing of colours is a third initial experience – but they do not always come in that order. The yogis in India very often in order to develop the power use the method of trātak, concentrating the vision on a single point or object – preferably a luminous object. Your looking at the star was precisely an exercise in trātak and had the effect which any yogi in India would have told you is normal. For all this is not fancy or delusion; it is part of an occult science which has been practised throughout the historic and prehistoric ages in all countries and it has always been known to be not merely auto-suggestive or hallucinatory in its results, but, if one can get the key, veridic and verifiable. Your first scepticism may be natural in a “modern” man plunging into these lasting things of the past, present and future – natural but not justifiable, because very obviously inadequate to the facts observed; but once you have seen, the first thing you should do is to throw all this vapid pseudo-science behind you, this vain attempt to stick physical explanations on supraphysical things, and take the only rational course.
P.S. I remember when I first began to see inwardly (and outwardly also with the open eye), a scientific friend of mine began to talk of after-images – these are only after-images! I asked him whether after-images remained before the eye for two minutes at a time – he said, “no”, to his knowledge only for a few seconds; I also asked him whether one could get after-images of things not around one or even not existing upon this earth, since they had other shapes, another character, other hues, contours and a very different dynamism, life-movements and values – he could not reply in the affirmative. That is how these so-called scientific explanations break down as soon as you pull them out of their cloudland of mental theory and face them with the actual phenomena they pretend to decipher.
Wuao, vuoi dire che si possono aprire dei portali ?
And here:
/t/tensegrity-core-tensegrity/5258
