There seem to be delays in the way intending works, a reply to a query may take hours/days/months to receive. This also reminds of the Coma Berenices decisionmaking delays (wait X hours before decision). Seen in bodily responses to various stimuli: medication and stimulants having variable delayed response, sharpness of effect making it much easier to attribute, stimulants (f.e.caffeine/nocotine) causing harsh “detox-style” headaches/symptoms, easy to attribute if you remember the 48h delay window, but confusing if expecting a fast action-reaction turnover.
Perhaps “sharpness”/squareness/abruptness of original intention increases the the response speed, and slow-ringing hesitant soft intention creates a slower, ambiguous, delayed and difficult-to-attribute response.
In first attention it sometimes manifests as having/lacking energy to sharply initiate tasks: with a slow-ringing goal the task gets postponed, slowly gaining momentum but may take infinitely long to start, “procrastination”. Compared to a sharp abrupt violent energy stimulus from internalized or external “supervisor/boss” figure, which can be redirected either into a similarly abrupt violent defence or used to amplify the existing task “wave” so it starts executing.
Reading tales of power provides similar external violent boost that lends energy for a fast start, so the request-reply turnover is faster and you can still remember which request is being replied to. Replies to a “slow” request being difficult to attribute to specific request effort timeline.